Rational pattern

Historically the fed has wanted to avoid haphazard moves. For example, there is surely a zero chance they will do anything at the next meeting because they would appear to have made a mistake at the previous one.

If you look back at rate changes, they usually are in some rational pattern. They pick a direction and go that way until they feel they accomplished their goal, then they go into a wait mode looking for signs. That’s where I think we are now and that will probably last through the election because they don’t want to have any impact on the voters.

I also feel that the housing marketing is going to really take a hit, I just read the first article that used the word “collapse” so it’s starting to get some press, and that will really dampen the economy moving forward and so in my scenario, the fed’s next move will be loosening, probably spring-summer 2007.

Advanced financial engineering

An article in the Bangkok post  leads me to believe that Thailand is in trouble financially, and that they are trying to manage it using advanced financial engineering. That is akin to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two US examples that scare the heck out of me.

I hope they can pay that debt when due, otherwise it’s crack up the printing press and devalue the currency time. That’s what they are trying to avoid with these swaps.

Deposit insurance

What deposit insurance does is protect the depositors, not the bank. So depositors don’t have any worries about which bank they deposit money into and aren’t a check and balance with regard to bank safety. What this gives the bank is a steady supply of low cost capital from which they can profit. If risk was taken into account, they would have to pay depositors a much higher rate of interest and they wouldn’t be nearly as profitable. This is essentially a federal subsidy for banks.